tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1677108722778516534.post6137627355323292821..comments2023-09-27T03:58:56.646-06:00Comments on Bessemer Opinions: Bessemer in 1965Joehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10842576168520693461noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1677108722778516534.post-59008690203709815792009-02-04T13:33:00.000-06:002009-02-04T13:33:00.000-06:00c.b.I am not posting your comment, because on this...c.b.<BR/>I am not posting your comment, because on this blog we have been through this many times, and I believe that a person who has paid their debt to society should then have all the rights and benefits and not have their past held up before them. The debt is paid.<BR/><BR/>Just like with Jesus.<BR/><BR/>But I am interested in this statement from you: <I>I find it interesting Joe that at times you use the Newspaper to support your thoughts and ideas, and at others you claim "the truth was not printed."</I><BR/><BR/>I write an "Opinion" column for the "OpEd" page. Of course I express my thoughts and ideas. But the "News" sections should have facts, which means truth. For instance, the papers of 1965 reporting that the only marchers in Selma were "beatniks" and that "Negroes" from Bessemer did not support the efforts of Dr. King...those are not facts. That was printing false statements to sway public opinions.Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10842576168520693461noreply@blogger.com